On Judgement…

October 26th, 2011

In a powerful, and uncommon, assessment of the Second Coming of Jesus and its implications; “The World’s Last Night”, C.S. Lewis concludes with a epiphany that gives the best treatment I have seen on Judgement. I share it here to pass on connections that will hopefully be helpful to fellow travelers of The Way.

Lewis states;

We have all encountered judgments or verdicts on ourselves in this life. Every now and then we discover what our fellow creatures really think of us. I don’t of course mean what they tell us to our faces: that we usually have to discount. I am thinking of what we sometimes overhear by accident or of the opinions about us which our neighbors or employees or subordinates unknowingly reveal in their actions: and of the terrible, or lovely, judgments artlessly betrayed by children or even animals. Such discoveries can be the bitterest or sweetest experiences we have. But of course both the bitter and the sweet are limited by our doubt as to the wisdom of those who judge. We always hope that those, who so clearly think us cowards or bullies are ignorant and malicious; we always fear that those who trust us or admire us are misled by partiality.

This is certainly true in my experience. EVERYONE has an opinion, yet real Truth seems elusive, even in my own mind. Millions of issues cloud the minds of those making judgements on us and even our own judgements of ourselves. There even exists, in American culture a research based principle known as the Dunning-Kruger Effect which states in a condensed form:

The unskilled suffer from illusory superiority, rating their own ability as above average, much higher than it actually is, while the highly skilled underrate their abilities, suffering from illusory inferiority. This leads to the situation in which less competent people rate their own ability higher than more competent people.

…or in the words of Charles Darwin:

“Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge”

There are many people whose faults, failings, and misconceptions are clear to all outside observers, but completely hidden to the person themselves. The passionate desire to not be “one of those people” is a core tenant to my own personal efforts at sanctification. It would be easy for us to trust own opinions, and somehow convince ourselves that “those other people, just don’t understand” or “I know what is best for me” or “they do that, but I have overcome that issue”.To any reasonable mind, the previous citations and observable patterns (little alone the multiple perception altering mental disorders and drugs) must certainly expose this isolationism and self-reliance as a failure of wisdom. Our own minds, in their natural state, are not reliable judges of the Truth.

THE ANSWER

Like many things you will see here, the solution to our dilemma is mirrored in multiple places. In education there are two general types of assessment; formative (assessment FOR learning) and summative (assessment OF learning). In place of learning a particular topic, we have Sanctification, or the process and result of God’s work to progressively make us holy and draw us into His perfection.

In speaking of the return of Christ and the Final Judgment Lewis writes:

…it will be infallible judgment. If it is favorable we shall have no fear, if unfavorable, no hope, that it is wrong. We shall not only believe, we shall know, know beyond doubt in every fiber of our appalled or delighted being, that as the judge has said, so we are: neither more nor less nor other. We shall perhaps even realize that in some dim fashion we could have known it all along. We shall know, and all creation will know too: our ancestors, our parents, our wives or husbands, our children. The unanswerable and (by then) self-evident truth about each will be known to all.

In a sentence, the Final Judgement’s most critical function is not to be a punishment, but a COMPLETELY accurate assessment of the efforts of God and His children in their individual sanctification. THE formative assessment of our sanctification if you will allow the coarse analogy. This final assessment need only cary un-holy fear if we have “not studied”. To evaporate our dread, we need only realize:

…happy are those whom it finds laboring in their vocations, whether they were merely going out to feed the pigs or laying good plans to deliver humanity a hundred years hence from some great evil. The curtain has indeed now fallen. Those pigs will never in fact be fed, the great campaign against White Slavery, [educational reform,] or Governmental Tyranny will never in fact proceed to victory….

…No matter; you were at your post when the Inspection came.

OUR RESPONSE

Our first response, should be our personal preparation for this final judgement; the continual, passionate, and humble sanctification of our souls. The Holy Spirit teaches us through a variety of sources, centered on: 1) God’s written Truth wherever He leads us to find it, 2) the work of the Holy Spirit directly on our souls and minds all things and 3) the judgements of other humans (see “On Judgements of Other People”). If we have followed this Way during our walk here with passion and sincerity, we have no fear of judgement as, while knowingly still short of our Father’s holiness, we shall receive a “well done” at the end of all things.

Secondly, and this MUST be united with a humble process of our own sanctification; but, we are given a powerful opportunity as Children of the King to bring peace to this world. In every person, there is both sin and the Godspark longing to be returned to its deep origin. This Godspark is longing to see Truth applied in clear evaluation. To have all pretense, falsehood, and politeness pulled back. To know that those around us speak the truth plainly, that “We are men of action; lies do not become us”. After we deal truthfully and compassionately with the flesh still in man, is there no greater scourge for sin than the Truth of God, judiciously, compassionately, and accurately applied?

On the judgements of other people

October 26th, 2011

In my current employment, I learned a principle several years ago, that still holds true:

The validity of criticism depends on the  excellence of the source

  

  • If someone lacking demonstrated talent believes you are un-talented: The question becomes “what do they know?” or the more colloquial, “they would not know [blank] if it bit them in the ass”. The probable validity of their judgement of you is low.

  • The corollary is also true:

  • If someone lacking demonstrated talent believes you are talented: If they have no true understanding of what talent is in the first place. Likewise, The probable validity of their judgement of you is low (even though it is positive).

  • However; if the source has validity proven by their own behavior then there judgement of you is more likely to be sound.


  • If someone who HAS demonstrated talent believes you are un-talented: You would be both wise and humble to take their advice, it is highly probable that their judgement of you is valid

  • If someone who HAS demonstrated talent believes you are talented: this is the opportunity to be genuinely encouraged.


Some final thoughts:

  • Validity is mostly dependent on the commenting person’s area of excellence. e.g. if a person is a great leader and they are judging your leadership skills, validity is supported.
  • Sadly, few people are excellent in many areas, so it will take many counselors to support multifaceted growth
  • A real joy is that true excellence recognizes and rejoices in another’s excellence (esp. when excellence is combined with confidence.) if someone is responding to your pursuit of excellence and personal growth with a negative behavior, it usually indicates they are either lacking in excellence or lack confidence in their excellence. We will deal with proper responses here in another post (Children of the King).

Interesting Patterns in Education…

May 22nd, 2008

I have found an interesting pattern recently, and I wonder if this is simply my experience, or a more broad common experience. I find several types of teachers / administrators to be in the educational environment.

Teaching from the Gut – There seem to be many teachers out there that have some innate, natural sense of “this is the right thing to do for XYZ child or classroom” They are phenomenal teachers, they do amazing instruction, and are quality educators, but they cannot explain to you WHY the things they do are the right educational pedagogy.

Teaching from the Gut, with reason – There are other educators, who not only have the aforementioned ability to naturally do the “right thing” in the classroom, like the above instructors, but when you ask them, “Why did you do that?” or “What did you want the student to learn from this activity?” they can tell you exactly why and or what. This is fantastic. Not only does the educator do the right thing for their students, but they have moved up Bloom’s Taxonomy and have understanding in addition to knowledge.

The only “deficiency” these instructors may have is that they can only use common language, not all of the “educational buzzwords” to explain their actions. One might ask “are you doing data-driven instruction in your classroom?” and this kind of teacher may reply, “No, I am just marking check marks on this clipboard which ones of my students can’t, can with some difficulty, or can easily color within the lines.” Brothers & sisters, let me tell you, if one of the “things you wanted the student to learn from the activity” [e.g. learning objective] was to “practice coloring inside the lines” [e.g. demonstrate small motor skills] then your marks on clipboard are data! Moreover, if you look at the check marks on your clipboard and realize “little Johnny” has been struggling with “coloring in the lines” for a while, and then try to do something to help little Johnny learn how to color in the lines better, then you have done data-driven decision making!

Educational Translators – There are some educational practitioners who can do what I have been doing in this post. One can take the high-level, and sometimes annoying plethora of educational buzz-words (see article on buzz-word bingo) and translate them to more common language and vice versa. They have the skill to not only know what the right thing is to do with students, and can explain it in common language, but if necessary they can explain it with the incredibly detailed, sometimes dizzying array of educational or technical buzzwords. You remember your Bloom’s, we would call these educators ones who have “synthesis level understanding”. They not only understand the the whole, and the pieces, but they can take the knowledge apart, rearrange it, and put it back together to make a new thing. I joke with many people that I believe my niche in the education industry is in the small group of us that are “teacher enough to talk to the teachers and geek enough to talk to the geeks.” I am absolutely certain there are better teachers in America than myself. I try to be a great teacher, but I am sure there are professionals out there that have forgotten more than I will ever know about being a great educator. I also carry no illusions that there are many computer people out there that can program circles around me (in fact, I am fortunate enough to call several of these people dear friends). However, in the words of my favorite author, “…if my fire is not large it is yet real, and there may be those who can light their candle at its flame.” It is my hope that I can be used to bridge the gap between geek and teacher, between ostentatiously large vocabulary toting theorists and solid, “from the gut” teachers. If I can ever be used to get these diverse groups in the room and communicating with each other effectively, then I will have served my purpose in this world of education.

Ostentatiously large vocabulary toting theorists – Sadly in any Aristotlian (Golden) Mean, there is always a good thing taken too far, which becomes a bad thing. We have all met a teacher or administrator, who has all the educational theorists memorized, and can use every educational buzzword in a properly structured sentence, but they can’t for the life of them actually get anything accomplished. I once had a Director of Curriculum that had her M.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction, and could bury you in a cacophony of vocabulary, but when push came to shove, she couldn’t tell us the simplest step to solve a critical problem. Sadly, these practitioners have fallen so in love with the process of learning, that they have forgotten that for any learning there is a reason why we learn. They were like the students we all chide for cramming the words in their head, so they could get a 100% on the exam, but never really understood the content we wanted them to learn.

Are these things common? I have only noticed a pattern in my life and experience, and I post it here for others to share and add. I look forward to your input!

On the population of teachers in the U.S.

May 12th, 2008

In my experience, I have noticed a pattern. I believe it to be fairly consistent across the educational landscape of the United States, and I share it here for either gentle confirmation, or violent damnation.

Of all the teachers I have met I believe I can loosely group them into one of four categories. I believe a person can change their position in a category, in fact I believe that if someone in any category is self aware and self reflective enough, combined with concerted effort, any change is possible:

 

  • Tier 1 – The Innovators — These are the truest practitioners of the delicate art of education. They are innovative, always thinking, always growing, always refining what they do to maximize the positive impact on their students. They make mistakes, take missteps, have ideas, and lessons that “blow up in their face” (sometimes literally for those of us Chemistry teachers… yes, kids, Mr. Washburn’s eyebrows DO grow back… -grin- ) They work too many hours, even though they try not to, and there are days that the weight of their calling or the realities of their students lives drop them to their knees in tears. Many if not most of these instructors have found ways to stay “under the radar” quietly working in their classrooms, changing children’s lives for the better, one at a time. They know if they are “discovered” their peers may hate them for “making others look bad” or be jealous of their talents. A process I have, admittedly never understood, even when I was a high school student myself. Many of this type of instructor have actually had other educators work against them on an issue truly good for students & learning simply out of spite. These innovative instructors must stay “under the radar” with administrators as well since in “reward” for the excellence of the educator, the administration may “promote” them out of the classroom, or simply ask them to do so much that they burn out.

 

  •  Tier 2 – Waiting in the Wings — This second class of teachers are the ones who, with just a little help, protection, encouragement, etc. would become the aforementioned excellent educators. For political reasons, they have learned to duck-and-cover very well. They desire more, but the multitude of small assaults build up, in what I tend to call the Lilliputian Effect, and numerous small injuries and pains become overwhelming. They are slowly worn down by the education machine and its politics and disappointments, until they settle in to a place of mediocrity. They want more, but believe they can not or will not obtain it.

 

  • Tier 3 – With enough effort — These instructors are much like the Tier 2 instructors, but they don’t even know where to begin. They want to be good educators, they have just been so beaten by life or the system, that they don’t really ever believe something good is possible. The good news is like the Tier 1 & Teir 2 teachers, these educators have the one, absolutely critical component for success: they want to be good teachers. With enough training, time, encouragement, support, and political protection these instructors can become better than they ever dreamed.

 

  •  Tier 4 – Kickers & Screamers — Sadly, these are the teacher that all of have had at one time as a student, and we tell jokes about now that we are older. The teacher with untenable, illogical rules; the professor who hasn’t bothered to update or improve a single mimeographed worksheet for 20 years; the politically vested teacher who coached little league (nothing against Little League) 15 years ago with the now Superintendent, which they now feels justifies them to procure items they will never use, and literally steal thousands of dollars a year in materiel from the school (not hyperbole, I am thinking of an actual former co-worker as I write). These are the warm bodies taking up space, damaging children every year, not because they lack talent, but because they don’t want to be good teachers, they just want to get their paycheck. These are the people that Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple Inc., says the teacher’s unions protect that prevent real growth from occurring in education. They will, as the name implies, only be dragged “kicking and screaming” into any change, even if the perfect educational reform came knocking at their classroom door.

 

How many times as educators have we watched motivational movies like “The Dead Poet’s Society” (a personal favorite), or “Stand and Deliver”, or recently “The Ron Clark Story” and see that if we set high expectations for our students, and then “scaffold” or provide small, attainable, sequential goals to accomplish these high expectations, students will succeed? Why is this so different for us as adults? We excuse ourselves from such growth with ideas like; “I’m too old”, “I’m not a digital native”, (here’s one I have used before) “I don’t have the time”. Didn’t many of us get into education because we believed it was worth it? We didn’t do it for the money, we became teachers because we believed it was worthwhile. That we could make a difference. I sincerely believe the Kickers and Screamers, which in my humble opinion are the only ones beyond saving, are less than 15% of the total U.S. K-12 teacher population. That means the rest of us in that 85% need to redouble our efforts, not to work more hours, or to work harder, but to work together, work smarter, communicate more and more effectively with the teachers in the classroom next to us, or across the lunch table to find ways to make ourselves better. All it takes to be a leader, is the willingness to take the first step, they humility to admit when you have taken a wrong turn, and the gentleness to ask others to come along with you. I hope you will join me and the thousands of hard working, passionate, professional educators to lead today.

The wacky world of educational technology software

January 2nd, 2008

In the time that I have been involved with technology (I still remember my first Trash 80 [TRS-80] in fifth grade and how cool it they were with their 5 1/4 floppies) and more recently as a teacher, I have found a rather frustrating pattern. It seems to me that one of several things inevitably happen with educational software:

CASE 1: PROGRAMMERS GONE WILD A group of “computer people” get together and realize their is a profit to be made in XYZ educational software title. They begin programming an application that is rock-stable, and build on solid programming practices. However, they really know nothing of education, or the needs of a classroom instructor or school administrator, and so what gets produced is a well running application that is not intuitive to use, nor is really useful in the classroom.

CASE 2: TEACHERS NOT CODERS A group of teachers, desperately in need of a program that truly helps their classroom instruction, or serves their students, use tools they are familiar with and push them to preform functions WELL beyond for which they were ever designed. (I have seen M$ Excel do amazing things) The result is an unstable, sometimes inflexible “application” that runs very poorly but actually fits the needs of the teachers that built it, and sometimes others.

CASE 3: I GOTTA GET ME MINE The combination of the sad plight of CASEs 1 & 2 combined with the chronically underpaid nature of educators & those in education drives a person or group of people put together an application that is actually useful. However, rather than building on open standards and with commonly importable and exportable formats, they build a exceptionally proprietary application that will not interoperate with ANY other application. (I cannot tell you how many assessment software titles that can’t import or export a simple .csv file! ) The sole reason for producing a software application this way is to produce as much profit as possible, or to exclusively support a particular piece of hardware they are trying to sell. So they create an application that makes a teacher, school, or district “pot committed” (NO ONE wants to enter those 1000+ students by hand in any system more than once or use three seperate applications to convert an unheard of .wtf file format to something useful with most of the data intact).

CASE 4: ADMINISTRATIVE LEADERSHIP Somewhere if an administrator has an bad idea and there is no one to implement it, is it still a bad idea? The answer is YES, just so we are clear. If a project makes it past the first three cases, it still has one hurdle left to clear before true success is in sight. It must get past the over-educated teachers who are now administrators. They buy a sales pitch, because they rightly want a product to help their teachers & students, but buy the sales pitch of XYZ software company producing bad software, or ABC software that is a good product, and in either case they implement the program horribly if at all. (The last district I worked for actually spent in excess of $60,000 over 3 years on a database application that has still never been deployed)

THE SOLUTION ? The funny thing about all of this is the solution are things at which educators should be very talented. I will leave it up to the reader to decide if they are funny – “ha ha”, or funny – “ouch that’s true.” 1) Collaboration – we must bring together talented programmers, quality educators, effective leaders, and facilitate communication amongst all the stakeholders. 2) Clear, measurable, attainable goals. The goal should be to produce applications built on both technology and educational industry standards, that are intuitive to use, and provide a real service to students, teachers, administrators, & parents. If we are ever to meet the needs of 21st Century students & education, we must produce applications with a clear purpose, used, tested, and improved with both constant input from good teachers and consistent comprehensive staff development.

Easing Open Source (FOSS) Adoption… the sneaky way….

December 19th, 2007

For reasons of which I am still not completely aware, Open Source software has a hard time catching on in education. The bullet points are obvious: high-powered, stable applications; astonishing compatibility (*nix tools have to be flexible to survive); and most of the software titles are free or incredibly inexpensive. It seems like little consideration would be needed, but comfort levels seem to be one of the major obstacles to Open Source adoption. However, several months ago, I found one possible solution:

One of the little tasks I am sometimes asked to do in my office is to transition machines when a new person comes on board. Our CAO at the time, having a strong experience in school administration, and being an excellent person for shepherding and taking good care of our teachers, he was a solid asset to the company. However, being a “non-tech person” he used the computer in his office for little more than email and MS Word documents. The machine in his office was an aging XP box much in need of rebuilding. However, when we went to rebuild his machine, we were short a spare XP license, and found it a fine time to further push our move to FOSS software. As a result, I installed Kbuntu Linux, OpenOffice, and Kontact. When introducing him to his new machine, I informed him the new machine was equipped with “a new version of Windows.” While I don’t suggest lying to your CAO or other administrator, as they sign the ‘ole paycheck, in this particular instance, it turned out very well. About a week or two later, he caught me in my office, and I asked him how his new machine was working. He replied enthusiastically, “it is the best version of Windows I have ever used!” Of course, a week or so after that his wife, who also works for the school, found out what I had done and let him in on the joke. Thankfully, he is a gracious person, and found it as humorous as I did! All in all, the point was proven that if you can get your users over the emotional stigma of “I have never used anything but Windows…” adoption can be very much eased.

Another story of a sly technology leader easing FOSS adoption comes from a colleague in a neighboring school district (who’s name and identity have been omitted here to to protect the innocent and innovative). During a presentation several years ago where the technology team was discussing the possibility of implementing an Open Source adoption. The tech leader was using a digital projector and laptop to take notes of the meeting. After allowing the debate to rage for a period on how “open source software will be cost-prohibitive due to extensive retraining needed for staff because of its difference in look, feel, and operation from commonly known, e.g. MS software.” The leader then asked the room of tech team members to identify the program he/she was using to take notes. The response was a unanimous, “MS Word.” He directed the staffers to look a the title bar of the application more closely, upon which he pointed out that in fact OpenOffice Writer was being used.

Duplicity, while not usually a good practice, but as we know from educational best practices, if you can inform based on solid facts, combined with an emotionally powerful moment, can be especially effective in facilitating FOSS adoption.

Best of luck!